Abstract

Full Text

Virtual power plants (VPPs) have become a revolutionary concept in both the IT sector and the energy industry, particularly in the context of integrating smart grids and renewable energy sources. These systems combine distributed energy resources, such as solar panels, wind turbines, battery storage and demand response systems operating as a single coordinated system. Data collection, transmission and processing systems for VPP operating modes are key components for their effective management and planning. They provide real-time monitoring, analysis and management of distributed energy resources. This operating principle enables VPPs to participate in electricity markets, provides additional services and enhances grid resilience. The paper is aimed at conducting a systematic analysis of modern data storage, processing and forecasting methods in the terms of virtual power plants including their effectiveness, limitations and applicability assessment in a dynamically developing energy system. Particular attention is paid to machine learning (ML) methods and optimization algorithms, which enable not only effective monitoring but also prediction of future loads and dynamics of renewable sources. Modern data storage solutions are considered and their advantages and limitations are evaluated. Papers describing key aspects of VPPs are also reviewed, including their data architecture, communication and information transmission systems, optimization methods and market integration, in terms of operational decision-making and ensuring high energy system resilience. The methods evaluation includes both theoretical aspects and practical examples of the technology application in the framework of research to improve the modern VPPs efficiency and reliability. This review was used to form promising directions for future research including the development of hybrid forecasting methods and the refinement of real-time heterogeneous data processing mechanisms.

Keywords

virtual power plants, data processing, data storage, forecasting, machine learning, distributed energy resources, smart grids

Artem A. Bezzubov Postgraduate Student, Department of Information Technology and Automation, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5962-5899

Mikhail D. Senyuk Ph.D. (Engineering), Lead Engineer, Department of Automated Electrical Systems, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5589-7922

Konstantin A. Aksyonov Ph.D. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology and Automation, Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1901-0690

1. Ruan G., Qiu D., Sivaranjani S., Awad A.S., Strbac G. Data-driven energy management of virtual power plants: A review. Advances in Applied Energy. 2024, vol. 14, 100170. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.adapen.2024.100170

2. Subramanya R., Yli-Ojanperä M., Sierla S., Hölttä T., Valta-kari J., Vyatkin V. A Virtual Power Plant Solution for Ag-gregating Photovoltaic Systems and Other Distributed Energy Resources for Northern European Primary Frequency Re-serves. Energies. 2021, no. 14(5), 1242. doi: 10.3390/en14051242

3. Kim M., Choi J., Yoon J. Development of the Big Data Management System on National Virtual Power Plant. 2015 10th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC). IEEE, 2015. Pp. 100-107. doi: 10.1109/3PGCIC.2015.101

4. Gotzens F., Heinrichs H., Hörsch J., Hofmann F. Performing energy modelling exercises in a transparent way - The issue of data quality in power plant databases. Energy Strategy Re-views. 2019, no. 23, pp. 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2018.11.004

5. Fischer U. Forecasting in database systems. Gesellschaft fur Informatik eV, 2015. Pp. 483-492. Available at: https://btw-2015.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/res/proceedings/Hauptband/ Disspreis/BTW2015_UlrikeFischer.pdf. (accessed 25 August 2025)

6. Oko-Odion C. Forecasting Techniques in Predictive Analyt-ics: Leveraging Database Management for Scalability and Real-Time Insights. International Journal of Research Publi-cation and Reviews. 2024, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1400-1414. Available at: https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V5ISSUE12/ IJRPR36212.pdf (accessed 25 August 2025)

7. Ma L., Aken D.V., Hefny A., Mezerhane G., Pavlo A., Gor-don G.J. Query-based Workload Forecasting for Self-Driving Database Management Systems. SIGMOD/PODS '18: International Conference on Management of Data.Houston TX USA: ACM, 2018. Pp. 631-645. doi: 10.1145/3183713. 3196908

8. Fischer U., Dannecker L., Siksnys L., Rosenthal F., Boehm M., Lehner W. Towards Integrated Data Analytics: Time Series Forecasting in DBMS. Datenbank-Spektrum. 2013, vol. 13, pp. 45-53. doi: 10.1007/s13222-012-0108-4

9. Döring L., Grumbach F., Reusch P. Optimizing Sales Fore-casts through Automated Integration of Market Indicators. 2024. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.07564 (accessed 25 August 2025)

10. Wu Y., Wang X., Yan L., He X., Dai H. A distributed event-triggered algorithm for constrained economic dispatch prob-lem via virtual communication. International Journal of Elec-trical Power & Energy Systems. 2024, vol. 155, 109501. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109501

11. Chen G., Li J. A fully distributed ADMM-based dispatch approach for virtual power plant problems. Applied Mathe-matical Modelling. 2018, vol. 58, pp. 300-312. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.06.010

12. Li J., Mo H., Sun Q., Wei W., Yin K. Distributed optimal scheduling for virtual power plant with high penetration of renewable energy. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2024, vol. 160, 110103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110103

13. Pandey A.K., Jadoun V.K., Sabhahit J.N. Scheduling and assessment of multi-area virtual power plant including flexible resources using swarm intelligence technique. Electric Power Systems Research. 2025, vol. 238, 111139. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2024.111139

14. Elgamal A.H., Shahrestani M., Vahdati M. Simultaneous sizing and energy management of multi-energy Virtual Power Plants operating in regulated energy markets. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2024, vol. 161. 110171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110171

15. Farahbakhsh H., Pourfar I., Ara A.L. Virtual power plant operation using an improved meta-heuristic optimization al-gorithm considering uncertainties. Journal of Operation and Automation in Power Engineering. 2024, no. 12(4), pp. 312-325. doi: 10.22098/joape.2023.11310.1844

16. Hu S., Chen Y., Feng J. A flexible interactive coordination control method of commercial virtual power plant based on WCVAR. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2024, vol. 160, 110128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110128

17. Song C., Jing X. Bidding strategy for virtual power plants with the day-ahead and balancing markets using distribu-tionally robust optimization approach. Energy Reports. 2023, no. 9(3), pp. 637-644. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.01.065

18. Qixing L., Nan L., Xianzhuo L., Zhe Z., Lichao L., Bo Z. Multi-level market joint dispatch strategy for multi-energy virtual power plant considering uncertainty and refined de-mand response. Energy Reports. 2024, vol. 11, pp. 2077-2089. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2024.01.072

19. Oladimeji O., Ortega A., Sigrist L., Rouco L., Sanchez-Martin P., Lobato E. Optimal Participation of Heterogeneous, RES-based Virtual Power Plants in Energy Markets. Energies. 2022, 15(9), 3207. doi: 10.3390/en15093207

20. Taheri S.I., Davoodi M., Ali M.H. A modified modeling approach of virtual power plant via improved federated learning. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2024, vol. 158, 109905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.109905

21. Deng X., Chen Y., Fan D., Liu Y., Ma C. GRU-integrated constrained soft actor-critic learning enabled fully distributed scheduling strategy for residential virtual power plant. Global Energy Interconnection. 2024, no. 7(2), pp. 117-129. doi: 10.1016/j.gloei.2024.04.001

22. Eikeland O.F., Hovem F.D., Olsen T.E., Chiesa M., Bian-chi F.M. Probabilistic forecasts of wind power generation in regions with complex topography using deep learning meth-ods: An Arctic case. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2022, vol. 15, 100239. doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100239

23. Li G., Zhang R., Bu S., Zhang J., Gao J. Probabilistic predic-tion-based multi-objective optimization approach for multi-energy virtual power plant. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2024, vol. 161, 110200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110200

24. Qi D., Xi X., Tang Y., Zheng Y., Guo Z. Real-time schedul-ing of power grid digital twin tasks in cloud via deep rein-forcement learning. Journal of Cloud Computing. 2024, no. 13, 121. doi: 10.1186/s13677-024-00683-z

25. Maldonato F., Hadachi I. Reinforcement Learning control strategies for Electric Vehicles and Renewable energy sources Virtual Power Plants. Engineering, Environmental Science, Computer Science. 2024, 269587652. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2405.01889

26. Liu C., Yang R.J., Yu X., Sun C., Rosengarten G., Lieb-man A., Wakefield R., Wong P.S., Wang K. Supporting vir-tual power plants decision-making in complex urban envi-ronments using reinforcement learning. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2023, vol. 99, 104915. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104915

27. Wu S., Wang Y., Liu L., Yang Z., Cao Q., He H., Cao Y. Two-stage distributionally robust optimal operation of rural virtual power plants considering multi correlated uncertainties. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2024, vol. 161, 110173. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110173

28. Liu C., Tao J., Liu Y., Wang X., Peng W. Data-Driven Net-work Latency Processing for Auxiliary Services in Virtual Power Plant. Electronics. 2023, no. 12(20), 4276. doi: 10.3390/electronics12204276

29. Popławski T., S Dudzik., Szeląg P., Baran J. A Case Study of a Virtual Power Plant (VPP) as a Data Acquisition Tool for PV Energy Forecasting. Energies. 2021, no. 14(19), pp. 6200. doi: 10.3390/en14196200

30. Cui S., Shanbhag U.V., Staudigl M. A regularized variance-reduced modified extragradient method for stochastic hierar-chical games. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applica-tions. 2025, vol. 2026, 11. doi: 10.1007/s10957-025-02683-8

31. Liu W., Xu H., Wang X., Zhang S., Hu T. Optimal dispatch strategy of virtual power plants using potential game theory. Energy Reports. 2022, no. 8(13), pp. 1069-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.148

32. Lombardi P., Stotzer M., Styczynski Z., Orths A. Multi-criteria optimization of an energy storage system within a Virtual Power Plant architecture. 2011 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting. IEEE, 2011. Pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/PES.2011.6039347

33. Han S., Sun L., Guo X., Lu J. Multi-objective Interval Opti-mization of Virtual Power Plant Considering the Uncertainty of Source and Load. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021, no. 299, 01011. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202129901011

34. Olanlari F.G., Amraee T., Moradi‐Sepahvand M., Ahmadi-an A. Coordinated multi‐objective scheduling of a multi‐energy virtual power plant considering storages and demand response. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution. 2022, no. 16(17), pp. 3539-3562. doi: 10.1049/gtd2.12543

35. Roald L., Misra S., Chertkov M., Backhaus S., Andersson G. Chance Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Curtailment and Reserves from Wind Power Plants. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291229643_Chance_Constrained_Optimal_Power_Flow_with_Curtailment_and_Reserves_from_Wind_Power_Plants (accessed 25 August 2025)

36. Shenoy V., Serna-Torre P., Schoenwald D., Hidalgo-Gonzalez P., Poveda J.I. Fast frequency regulation of virtual power plants via Droop Reset Integral Control (DRIC). Elec-tric Power Systems Research. 2024, vol. 235, pp. 110762. doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2024.11076

37. Zaheer M.H. Effects of Renewable Energy Sources on Day-Ahead Electricity Markets. 2021. Available at: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021arXiv210205730H/abstract (accessed 25 August 2025)

38. Shumway R.H., Stoffer D.S. ARIMA Models. In: Time Se-ries Analysis and Its Applications. Springer, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-52452-8_3

39. Greff K., Srivastava R.K., Koutnik J., Steunebrink B.R., Schmidhuber J. LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 2017, no. 28(10), pp. 2222-2232. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582924

40. Elamin N., Fukushige M. Modeling and forecasting hourly electricity demand by SARIMAX with interactions. Energy. 2018, vol. 165 (B), pp. 257-268. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018. 09.157

 

Bezzubov A.A., Senyuk M.D., Aksyonov K.A. Review of Data Storage, Processing and Prediction Methods Applicable in The Context of Virtual Power Plants. Elektrotekhnicheskie sistemy i kompleksy [Electrotechnical Systems and Complexes], 2025, no. 3(68), pp. 56-66. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18503/2311-8318-2025-3(68)-56-66